18 batteries - 144 guns.... it is fifteen batteries of eight gun each. That is 120 guns.
18 batteries - 144 guns.... it is fifteen batteries of eight gun each. That is 120 guns.
Interesting... Percival, if only privately, has grasped what happened, while Gort is distracted by social-status issues. One hopes that Gort will get his head clear, and that Percival will manage to apply what he learned.Percival, in his calm underwhelming way, agreed with Simmons, ruling the exercise void, the defenders would have held the road, and that he would deal with Stewart. Gort was mortified to see such a senior figure, and a companion of numerous dinner parties so embarrassed, and formed a very bad opinion of Stewart. Percival told Stewart he would see him on the Monday, and discuss what had taken place, but privately Percival agreed with the Umpires and was mightily concerned that two of what he had considered up to now as his best battalions, were so well beaten.
How spooky you should mention Ugaki, His name cropped while I was pursuing another small interest in the IJN.Interesting parallel with Ugaki at OTL Midway
So on 1st May 1942, when the IJN are wargaming the Midway op (as Coral Sea was unfolding), the "Red" i.e. American commander decides to get all aggressive and... moves his carriers to the northeast of the island, not a million miles away from the actual "Point Luck" that Fletcher and Spruance used.How spooky you should mention Ugaki, His name cropped while I was pursuing another small interest in the IJN.
Now I should state here and now, I have no expertise on American operations whatsoever, I'm just a journeyman history buff when it comes to them. So Ugaki was quite new to me, and maybe to many of the rest of you. So to bring everyone else up to speed on what I know, here goes.
Matome Ugaki was Yamamoto's chief of staff, who was in the second G4M, which was shot down over Bougainville, Solomon Islands in 1943, when Yamamoto was killed. He later commanded at battleship division at 'The Battle of the Philippine Sea, and at Leyte Gulf, and on hearing that Japan was going to surrender, got himself on a Kamikaze mission. However, he also kept an extensive and revealing war diary, to quote Wikipedia. Given we are so short of good Japanese WW2 source material due to most Japanese cities being fire bombed, along with a couple having a nuclear bomb dropped on them, few records survived, so his diaries provide very useful insight, or so I'm told. I've only just stumbled on him, following down the reasons why only the Kitakami and Oi light cruisers were modified to take 10 quadruple mount torpedo launchers for the Japanese 'Long Lance' torpedo.
So, if anyone know more about Ugaki, please enlighten us uninformed.
I have a copy of his diaries as edited by Gordon Prange that I bought with a prize I got from my college for Collections results. So my copy still has the letter of congratulation from Sir Roger Bannister as master of the college in it too! Happy to have a root around in it if you have any specific questions - been awhile since I read itHow spooky you should mention Ugaki, His name cropped while I was pursuing another small interest in the IJN.
Now I should state here and now, I have no expertise on American operations whatsoever, I'm just a journeyman history buff when it comes to them. So Ugaki was quite new to me, and maybe to many of the rest of you. So to bring everyone else up to speed on what I know, here goes.
Matome Ugaki was Yamamoto's chief of staff, who was in the second G4M, which was shot down over Bougainville, Solomon Islands in 1943, when Yamamoto was killed. He later commanded at battleship division at 'The Battle of the Philippine Sea, and at Leyte Gulf, and on hearing that Japan was going to surrender, got himself on a Kamikaze mission. However, he also kept an extensive and revealing war diary, to quote Wikipedia. Given we are so short of good Japanese WW2 source material due to most Japanese cities being fire bombed, along with a couple having a nuclear bomb dropped on them, few records survived, so his diaries provide very useful insight, or so I'm told. I've only just stumbled on him, following down the reasons why only the Kitakami and Oi light cruisers were modified to take 10 quadruple mount torpedo launchers for the Japanese 'Long Lance' torpedo.
So, if anyone know more about Ugaki, please enlighten us uninformed.
Thank you for that, I'd heard a little bit about the Japanese bending a war game to suit but not in that detailSo on 1st May 1942, when the IJN are wargaming the Midway op (as Coral Sea was unfolding), the "Red" i.e. American commander decides to get all aggressive and... moves his carriers to the northeast of the island, not a million miles away from the actual "Point Luck" that Fletcher and Spruance used.
Ugaki is chief judge and says that's not allowed. Because... well, because Americans - despite, you know, Doolittle managing to bomb Japan - don't go for bold offensive moves.
The Red force guy is in tears here. But he soldiers on - well, sailors on, I guess - and later launches a carrier strike against Kido Butai. The dice fall.. and for the IJN team, they fall... poorly.
The American strike was judged to have sunk, um Akagi and Kaga, if I remember correctly (both Symonds The Battle of Midway and Parshall/Tully in Shattered Sword have detail) but Ugaki made a judge's call that really the damage wouldn't be that bad because, well, Yamato Damashii I guess, and anyway the dastardly Yankees would never be so brave as to do something that daring and courageous because they lacked fighting spirit.
Yamamoto was a little perturbed by some of the exercise and did question what would happen if an American carrier force were detected in an unexpected position, but Genda Minoru, architect of IJN carrier ops doctrine, says "we'll give them a backhand across the face so hard their kids are gonna need dentures". Actually it's a lot more pithy in Japanese, but when your ops guy doesn't have an actual answer but basically says "Carrier Striking Force - OOH RAH!" it turns out that everybody in the room decided that it wasn't going to be them who was accused of defeatism and kept their heads below the parapet.
Lucky Boy!, any specific questions?, blimey where would I start.I have a copy of his diaries as edited by Gordon Prange that I bought with a prize I got from my college for Collections results. So my copy still has the letter of congratulation from Sir Roger Bannister as master of the college in it too! Happy to have a root around in it if you have any specific questions - been awhile since I read it
Will have a look and come back to youLucky Boy!, any specific questions?, blimey where would I start.
I'd love to know of any opinions he held about Vice Admiral Nobutake Kondo and his Southern Force in December 1941, and of the demotion of Kondo after losing the battleship Kirishima in late 1942. And does he offer any opinions of Admiral Ozawa?
Historically the 12th Indian Brigade was, in my opinion, on par with the Australians, and may have been even better. They had been fighting for the best part of a month, mostly as the rear-guard of the retreating III Indian Corps. Owing to the failure in command of 11th Indian Division, Murray-Lyon had been replaced by the CO of 12th Brigade, by Brig Paris, with the CO of the Argylls, Lt Col Stewart stepped into Paris's shoes. A very tired Stewart, new to commanding a Bde, made mistakes in deployments and was badly punished by the Japanese. In fairness to Stewart, at that time, the British Indian forces were in desperate need of time to rest and regroup, but Yamashita kept the pressure on, and they cracked!There may be selective quoting going on, but Ugaki really is coming across as the stereotypical Banzai-brained Imperial Japanese officer.
Getting back to the TL, the British have just had a sharp lesson in what can happen to a road-bound static defence that views the jungle as an impassable obstacle when faced with a mobile opponent employing infiltration tactics. Whether they learn the lesson is yet to be seen, but the divisions in the high command do not bode well.
OTL the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders have a name as one of the few jungle-trained units the British had, but in the campaign they were one of the battalions devastated by Shimada's tanks at Slim River. I note that the exercise did not feature tanks (do the British even have any?) or air support.
He goes on to suggest that if Nagumo and Kusaka dont have the stomach for the Pearl Harbour operation they should resign and says that he told Yamamoto so. More cryptically in the same entry of 22nd OCtober 41 he says 'With Vice Admiral Ozawa just sent to be commander in chief of the Southern Fleet, it can be said that the matter came to a happy end because the navy had no other candidate to replace Nagumo'
On 29th October 1941 he again references Nagumo appearing very anxious about his mission and goes on to suggest that he would not be worried at all but quite happy to face death etc
I don't know quite when they were given their posts, but historically Kondo led the Southern Force, including the battlecruisers of the IJN distant support force, while Ozawa led the IJN close cover force for the Malaya invasion transports and escorts .
Nagumo has overall responsibility for the ship borne invasion forces of Malaya and Philippines, so I think it would be understandable that he was anxious.